“Active, persistent, and careful consideration of any belief or supposed
form of knowledge in light of the grounds that support it”.
(Dewey, 1933, cited by Smith, 1999)
Wrong. I have quickly come to the realisation that I do not know everything, as I assumed teachers should. This leaves me wondering whether in fact the teachers I hold in such high regard actually knew it either. By 'know', I mean: ingrained, second nature, revised, and ready for recall at any given point. It is true I am ready come my lesson; I know my subject, but not without the pain of having to research, read and revise beforehand. The problem I face, in all honesty, and this is not new knowledge to me, is that I have an absolutely shocking memory! I have a First Class Honors Degree and graduated with an average grade of 84%. This is an achievement I am very proud of: I am good at what I do, I have passion and motivation for my subject, but this unfortunately does not equal knowledge. However, I can see the light at the end of the tunnel; it seems once I have taught a subject as a teacher, I am able to recall the information much easier than if I had read and wrote it as a student.
I further surprise myself with the extent to which I utilise social media as a means of staying current within my sector. Although I am not able to remember what I have read enough to recall it within my planning, I do remember that I have read 'something' useful, and am able to signpost myself to the relevant source. I am primarily using twitter and yammer for this purpose, and recently read a post by Nicky Morgan (2015) proposing the introduction of a baseline assessment at the beginning of the Foundation Stage. I intend to include this suggestion as a point of debate within my planning of the Senior Practitioner module.
No comments:
Post a Comment